Many Months Later, Democrats Still Can't Explain One Thing

So what happened? First we have CNN who through undercover work has admitted there's no evidence of a Trump / Russia collusion now we have members of the government who were pushing the fact that there was evidence staying silent? Give me a break!

I called this MONTHS ago, there's no evidence because it's not there. Actual collusion would have to take place otherwise. What can't you dingbat liberals understand about that? YOU GOT NOTHING!

I, for one, want them to come forward and show us all this "circumstantial evidence" they've been talking about. They won't because Liberals are LIARS!

As Written by Kerry Picket for the Daily Caller:

Five months after Ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff said that “circumstantial evidence” of collusion influencing the 2016 election existed between Trump campaign associates and Moscow, he and other Democrats on the committee are silent about it or struggle to explain the supposed collusion.

Schiff made his remark on NBC’s “Meet the Press” when confronted with the fact that James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence under President Obama, rejected the idea that any evidence of such collusion happened while he led the U.S. intelligence agencies.

Schiff said at the time: “I was surprised to see Director Clapper say that because I don’t think you can make that claim categorically as he did. I would characterize it this way at the outset of the investigation: There is circumstantial evidence of collusion. There is direct evidence, I think, of deception and that’s where we begin the investigation.”

He later said, “There is certainly enough for us to conduct an investigation. The American people have a right to know and in order to defend ourselves, we need to know whether the circumstantial evidence of collusion and direct ........


Dems Can't Explain 'Circumstantial Evidence O | The Daily Caller

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author of the article and not necessarily shared or endorsed by

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.